Wednesday, September 28, 2016

Lazarus at Our Gate?

Homily for Sunday, September 25,  2016   Graves Chapel

Lessons:
1 Timothy 6:6-19
Luke 16: 19-31

The collect appointed for today:

O God, you declare your almighty power chiefly in showing mercy and pity: Grant us the fullness of your grace, that we, running to obtain your promises, may become partakers of your heavenly treasure; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.


Today we revisit Paul’s first letter to Timothy, and we find here some of scripture’s most famous words about the desire for wealth and its perils: “For we brought nothing into the world, and we can take nothing out of it…For the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil.” In his parable, our Savior Jesus, who died as poor as he was born, tells the story of a poor beggar who has come to be known as “Lazarus at the Gate.”  The parables and lessons Jesus teaches sometimes have enough ambiguity, enough nuance, so that they can be interpreted in various ways.  Jesus doesn’t often speak in black and white terms on moral issues, primarily because the focus of his lessons is more likely to be mercy than condemnation. Think of the incident of the woman caught in adultery and brought to Jesus by the Pharisees who expect Jesus to agree with them in their harsh judgment of her. Instead, Jesus challenges them, “You who are without sin, cast the first stone at her.”  The Pharisees slink away, and Jesus says to the woman, “Neither will I condemn you.”  In the story of Lazarus at the gate, however, Jesus is very clear about who will be condemned—and why.  In this story, the rich man doesn’t have a chance.
In my last sermon, I shared Richard Rohr’s explanation of the ways in which scripture suggests over and over again that we human followers of Christ share moral equivalency with God.  By using the term “moral,” Rohr makes clear that we are, of course, in no way equal to God on our own terms; instead, it is God’s expectation of our behavior towards others that places us on a plain of moral equivalency with God. When I treat others as I would have them treat me, I show them God’s love. In becoming God’s face, feet, and hands in the world, we are called to that moral equivalency and asked no less than to seek and serve Christ in all persons—as Christ himself would serve them. 
So how would a world governed by humans living out God’s call to moral equivalency appear?  Wouldn’t such a world truly be God’s Kingdom? Here is the way the prophet Isaiah described it:
“The wolf shall live with the lamb.
  The leopard shall lie down with the kid,
  the calf and the lion cub together,
  and a little child shall lead them.”
Who are the wolves, leopards, and bears in our society, in our world? Are they those who are rich and powerful? Then, who are the lambs, kids, and calves? If Jesus himself, according to this prophecy, is the little child who leads them, how is Jesus childlike?
            Certainly, in the power of his wisdom, in the unyielding courage we see him display over and over again in his defiance of the authorities, Jesus is not a child.  Or, at least, he doesn’t appear to be very child-like. Still, children seem to come into the world with a powerful sense of what is fair or unfair, what is true or false. Think of the tale of The Emperor’s New Clothes and the little boy who speaks the truth about what the emperor is really wearing (or not wearing, in this case.) Any adult who has ever interacted with a child has surely heard the impassioned words, “That is not fair!” Children possess a certain fearlessness on behalf of justice.
            I am reminded of a scene in the beloved novel (and movie), To Kill a Mockingbird. Brave and righteous attorney Atticus Finch takes his pipe, a book, and a lamp to the courthouse in the small town of Maycomb, Alabama. He intends to spend the night outside the jail cell of his client, Tom Robinson, a black man who has been wrongly accused and found guilty of raping a white woman. The scene is set in the 1930s, and Atticus believes some of the white men of that community may come to the jail that night and try to lynch Tom.
As it turns out, Atticus anticipated correctly. A mob of men arrives in the middle of the night, doing that thing that mobs do best: turning ordinary decent people into ravening beasts. All it takes is one or two forceful leaders to spew hatred and to challenge the manhood of their followers, and a mob is born.
            But what Atticus did not anticipate, and certainly did not want, was to have his young children appear on the scene. Jem, his son, and Scout, his daughter, along with their friend Dill, decide it is their job to help their father. They have no idea what is about to happen; they simply know, in that instinctive way of children, that Atticus may need them.
            When Scout and Jem and Dill arrive on the square, they find Atticus holding firm outside the jailhouse door, trying to reason with the menacing leaders of the mob. Scout, without considering the risks, weaves herself through the crowd and stands next to her father. Having lived all of her young life in this little town, she is puzzled to see men she knows behaving in such a mean way. And Scout does that thing that Jesus does best when he wants to get our attention: she calls the men by name. With the innocent honesty of a little girl, she asks them what they are doing. She speaks directly to the father of one of her classmates, asking him to say “hey” to his little boy for her. In this way, the men of that mob become individuals again. Each one becomes himself again, aware of his responsibilities, and the mob silently disperses.
            Scout has become the little lamb who leads them, with innocent courage and a childlike desire for fairness—for what is right.  Like all children, Scout possesses no power. She certainly is no king or potentate or warrior—or, for that matter, wolf, leopard, bear, or lion.  Like Jesus, and like her father, Scout is on the side of the poor, the defenseless, the downtrodden.
            The poor man in today’s parable spends most of his time begging next to the gate of a rich man’s property. Like the courthouse doorway being guarded by Atticus Finch, the gate in this parable represents the barrier between two arenas: unjust power on one side and deserving poverty on the other. We are told several things about the rich man: that he dresses in purple and fine linen, that he feasts sumptuously every day, that he has five equally wealthy and corrupt brothers. But we are never told his name.  In this story, only the poor beggar covered in sores is given a name: Lazarus.  Consider! In the telling of this parable, Jesus refuses to dignify the rich man with a name, but he gives the name Lazarus, a name we know in another context as being the name of one of his best friends, to a beggar whose sores are licked by dogs. In the world we live in today (and, to be fair, in past generations), rich and powerful people are known and revered by name.  Even in Jesus’s time, people like the beggar Lazarus were considered members of a nameless throng, the countless, wretched, and powerless poor. I guess when we see them in that way, they are easier for us to ignore. But in this parable, Jesus clearly illustrates who is more important in God’s kingdom. When he dies, Lazarus is carried to heaven by angels and is comforted. The rich man, who never helped Lazarus while he had the opportunity, dies and goes straight to hell. 
          With the kind of audacity possessed by people who have always had things their way, the nameless rich man asks Father Abraham to send Lazarus to him with some water.  Abraham refuses, explaining that in the Kingdom things just don’t work that way. Then the rich man wants Abraham to send Lazarus to his father’s house to warn his family members about what is in store for them if they keep hording their wealth, arguing when Abraham objects that his brothers will surely believe a risen dead man—the beggar Lazarus, in this case. In telling this parable, Jesus clearly reminds us, as he reminds the deceased rich man, “If they do not listen to Moses and the prophets, neither will they be convinced, even if someone rises from the dead.”
            Could there be a double meaning for us in those last words of the parable?  Have we really been convinced by our risen Lord that serving Him is more important than serving our own self-interest? Or have we forsaken our Christian moral responsibility to seek and serve the Lord in ALL persons?  If we need a reminder of how our responsibility plays itself out in the real world, we need look no further than Paul’s letter to Timothy:  As for those who in the present age are rich, command them not to be haughty, or to set their hopes on the uncertainty of riches, but rather on God who richly provides us with everything for our enjoyment. They are to do good, to be rich in good works, generous, and ready to share, thus storing up for themselves the treasure of a good foundation for the future, so that they may take hold of the life that really is life.”
The collect for today states, “O God, you declare your almighty power chiefly in showing mercy and pity.”  Poor Lazarus found the mercy and pity he had always deserved when he arrived in heaven.  May we discover such abundant mercy on this side of the heavenly gate as we love all others just as Christ has loved us and take hold of the life that really is LIFE. 

AMEN.


Wednesday, September 7, 2016

Humility

Homily for August 28, 2016            Graves Chapel
  
Who does he think he is?  He hangs around with all the worst sorts of trashy people. Just get a look at those friends of his.  Fishermen and tax collectors, women with bad reputations.  Just who does he think he is? I’ve heard his father is a carpenter. A carpenter of all things! And there is also that story going around about his mother being in a family way before she married his father. Who does he think he is? Just the other day, he said that a bartender—a bartender—knows how to pray better than I do.  Where does he get the nerve to lord it over me—my family has always been of high social standing! I have studied with all of the first-rate scholars, and he never went to college. I know my scripture forwards and backwards, and yet he has the nerve to correct my teaching. Just who in the heck does he think he is?
Like the Pharisee, we may ask such questions.  Why did God, the Lord of the Universe, decide to send his own Son, the long-awaited Messiah, into the world in such a humble way?  Why, of all things, did he have to be born in a stable, have a manger for his first bed? Why did he have to grow up in a poor family and be executed in such a demeaning way, hanging on a cross between two thieves?  In some ways these are the most fundamental questions all of us should ask about Jesus. God certainly could have sent Jesus as a king if he chose.  The great king, the one God clearly loved and blessed and forgave over and over, King David, could have returned to rule his people. God can do that kind of thing, after all. The prophecies about the Messiah all said that he would be a descendant of David and would come to rule his people. It is no wonder that the Pharisees were perplexed to find the son of a carpenter preaching with such authority.  He defied their understanding of propriety.
If you have heard me preach before—and some of you have kindly listened to many of my sermons—you have probably noticed that I often speak about LOVE. I admit that the Lord’s admonition to us to love our neighbors as ourselves is my favorite Biblical theme. Since Jesus called this the second part of the “Great Commandment,” connecting our requirement to love each other to the rule that we should love the Lord our God with all our heart, soul, and mind, then my conclusion that LOVE is of the utmost importance seems correct.
The lessons for today, from Hebrews and Luke, suggest that only humility makes it possible for us to express Christ-like love in a way that makes it acceptable to the ones we love.  If we love others from a position of equality with them, and not authority over them, they find it easier to accept the love we offer.
Jesus says in Luke 14, “For all who exalt themselves will be humbled, and all who humble themselves will be exalted.”  How and why do we find ourselves in situations where we “exalt” ourselves?  Ahh…one of those questions (and indictments from Jesus) that makes me squirm.  Sometimes I just need to be able to feel good about myself.  Life can throw a lot of things at us, after all, that can make us feel very low. I don’t think I am the only one who has suffered wounds to my ego from time to time, and wounded egos need reassurance. We want to know that we are okay, that others believe us to be respectable. Isn’t it lucky for us that Jesus has been there, too? Jesus understands that our wounded ego wants to be seated at the head of the table, that it can be hard for us to accept a lower position. But Jesus also understands that, in the long run, we will feel better about ourselves when we manage to be humble.  I wonder if that is why Jesus was thirty years old when he finally began his ministry—old enough and wise enough to have experienced many wounds to his ego and to understand the necessity of putting our egos—ourselves—last.
The mystery of humility is the way we are actually blessed by it. Beloved priest and theologian Henri Nouwen had these words to say about today’s lesson from Luke: “The poor have a treasure to offer precisely because they cannot return our favors. By not paying us for what we have done for them, they call us to inner freedom, selflessness, generosity, and true care. Jesus says, ‘When you have a party, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind: then you will be blessed, for they have no means to repay you, and so you will be repaid when the upright rise again.’  The repayment Jesus speaks of is spiritual. It is the joy, peace and love of God that we so much desire. This is what the poor give us, not only in the afterlife, but already in the here and now.”
Love is a spiritual gift because it is intangible. Love is both an emotion and a behavior, something we know when we encounter it, but cannot really define. Love for one another is required from us by a God who embodies love.  But it is humility that provides the stance, the posture, from which love is properly extended to others. When someone says, “I love you,” from a position of power, out of a need to control us, does it feel like love? When an act of charity is performed, say of giving a few dollars to a beggar, and it is made from an attitude of condescension, does it feel like love to that poor beggar?  I quite often hear complaints about the “attitude” of a homeless person, and I wonder if the offending attitude may have begun in the manner the gift was offered. Maybe, maybe not. Either way, Jesus tells us that our job is to govern our own behavior with humility and not concern ourselves with the behavior or attitudes of others.  As the writer of Hebrews says in today’s lesson, “Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for by doing that, some have entertained angels without knowing it.”  Wouldn’t it be just like God to send us a grumpy and unappreciative angel to test our willingness to be generous—and humble?
On the evening of the Last Supper, when Jesus gathered all of his disciples together for the Passover, the very last time he would have an opportunity to be with them before his death, he illustrated to them the true importance of humble service to others. It was a lesson the disciples found very disconcerting. Jesus knelt before each one of them and washed his feet. To the disciples, it seemed very wrong for their Lord and master to perform what seemed to them to be a humiliating task. That was precisely the Lord’s lesson for them—and for us. Jesus wanted all of his disciples to understand that humility and humiliation are two very different things. An act of love, performed in true humility, makes all involved feel whole and worthy. An act of humiliation is something done to us by another who behaves toward us as our superior and who wants to make us feel inferior. Humiliation wounds our ego—and that is its purpose.
To return to my earlier supposition, then, is it true that only humility on our part makes it possible for someone to accept the love we offer?  I believe so. Love of this kind is love exchanged between equals. We call this kind of love unconditional.  Sometimes we say that only God is capable of unconditional love. Only God can put up with the bad behavior of humans and still love them. God is clearly the expert, but God also asks us to emulate his love.
Our trying to be like God, to love in God’s unconditional manner, sounds like an impossible requirement.  Richard Rohr explains the radical nature of God’s expectations of us by showing how scripture teaches us what he calls “four moral equivalencies.”  Rohr says that the first of these is the moral equivalency Jesus makes between himself and other humans: “Whatever you do to others, you do to me” (Matthew 25:40). The second moral equivalency, according to Rohr, is the one Jesus makes between himself and God: “I and the Father are one” (John 10:30).  The third moral equivalency is the one between any person and God: “The Spirit is within you” (John 14:17). Throughout the Gospels and on his final departing, Jesus promises the eternal presence of the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, within each individual. The fourth and final moral equivalency, then, is the one Jesus makes between any one of us and every other person: Jesus tells us, “In everything you do, treat others exactly as you would have them treat you” (Matthew 7:12).
Accepting that, in God’s terms, we are equal to every other human being, even those we dislike, requires humility. In God’s eyes, we are no more and no less worthy than any of our neighbors. Accepting that God the Holy Spirit dwells equally within each of us is both reassuring and challenging—and also humbling. We are called to recognize that the indwelling Spirit of God extends love to others primarily through us, through our actions. Accepting that we are God’s hands and feet on this planet, that we are required (as today’s beautiful collect says) to bring forth the fruit of good works calls us to humble service.
The four “moral equivalencies” define unconditional love. In any mathematical equation, an “equals” sign offers the guidepost.  Whatever we place to the left of that symbol must be, in some way, exactly the same as whatever we place to its right. How can this be possible when we say we are equal to each other, equal to Jesus, equal to God?  I guess the answer to that question can only be—with great love and great humility. 
In every equation of human moral behavior, the grace of God is the equalizer.  On that we can put our faith.  AMEN.