Wednesday, September 28, 2016

Lazarus at Our Gate?

Homily for Sunday, September 25,  2016   Graves Chapel

Lessons:
1 Timothy 6:6-19
Luke 16: 19-31

The collect appointed for today:

O God, you declare your almighty power chiefly in showing mercy and pity: Grant us the fullness of your grace, that we, running to obtain your promises, may become partakers of your heavenly treasure; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.


Today we revisit Paul’s first letter to Timothy, and we find here some of scripture’s most famous words about the desire for wealth and its perils: “For we brought nothing into the world, and we can take nothing out of it…For the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil.” In his parable, our Savior Jesus, who died as poor as he was born, tells the story of a poor beggar who has come to be known as “Lazarus at the Gate.”  The parables and lessons Jesus teaches sometimes have enough ambiguity, enough nuance, so that they can be interpreted in various ways.  Jesus doesn’t often speak in black and white terms on moral issues, primarily because the focus of his lessons is more likely to be mercy than condemnation. Think of the incident of the woman caught in adultery and brought to Jesus by the Pharisees who expect Jesus to agree with them in their harsh judgment of her. Instead, Jesus challenges them, “You who are without sin, cast the first stone at her.”  The Pharisees slink away, and Jesus says to the woman, “Neither will I condemn you.”  In the story of Lazarus at the gate, however, Jesus is very clear about who will be condemned—and why.  In this story, the rich man doesn’t have a chance.
In my last sermon, I shared Richard Rohr’s explanation of the ways in which scripture suggests over and over again that we human followers of Christ share moral equivalency with God.  By using the term “moral,” Rohr makes clear that we are, of course, in no way equal to God on our own terms; instead, it is God’s expectation of our behavior towards others that places us on a plain of moral equivalency with God. When I treat others as I would have them treat me, I show them God’s love. In becoming God’s face, feet, and hands in the world, we are called to that moral equivalency and asked no less than to seek and serve Christ in all persons—as Christ himself would serve them. 
So how would a world governed by humans living out God’s call to moral equivalency appear?  Wouldn’t such a world truly be God’s Kingdom? Here is the way the prophet Isaiah described it:
“The wolf shall live with the lamb.
  The leopard shall lie down with the kid,
  the calf and the lion cub together,
  and a little child shall lead them.”
Who are the wolves, leopards, and bears in our society, in our world? Are they those who are rich and powerful? Then, who are the lambs, kids, and calves? If Jesus himself, according to this prophecy, is the little child who leads them, how is Jesus childlike?
            Certainly, in the power of his wisdom, in the unyielding courage we see him display over and over again in his defiance of the authorities, Jesus is not a child.  Or, at least, he doesn’t appear to be very child-like. Still, children seem to come into the world with a powerful sense of what is fair or unfair, what is true or false. Think of the tale of The Emperor’s New Clothes and the little boy who speaks the truth about what the emperor is really wearing (or not wearing, in this case.) Any adult who has ever interacted with a child has surely heard the impassioned words, “That is not fair!” Children possess a certain fearlessness on behalf of justice.
            I am reminded of a scene in the beloved novel (and movie), To Kill a Mockingbird. Brave and righteous attorney Atticus Finch takes his pipe, a book, and a lamp to the courthouse in the small town of Maycomb, Alabama. He intends to spend the night outside the jail cell of his client, Tom Robinson, a black man who has been wrongly accused and found guilty of raping a white woman. The scene is set in the 1930s, and Atticus believes some of the white men of that community may come to the jail that night and try to lynch Tom.
As it turns out, Atticus anticipated correctly. A mob of men arrives in the middle of the night, doing that thing that mobs do best: turning ordinary decent people into ravening beasts. All it takes is one or two forceful leaders to spew hatred and to challenge the manhood of their followers, and a mob is born.
            But what Atticus did not anticipate, and certainly did not want, was to have his young children appear on the scene. Jem, his son, and Scout, his daughter, along with their friend Dill, decide it is their job to help their father. They have no idea what is about to happen; they simply know, in that instinctive way of children, that Atticus may need them.
            When Scout and Jem and Dill arrive on the square, they find Atticus holding firm outside the jailhouse door, trying to reason with the menacing leaders of the mob. Scout, without considering the risks, weaves herself through the crowd and stands next to her father. Having lived all of her young life in this little town, she is puzzled to see men she knows behaving in such a mean way. And Scout does that thing that Jesus does best when he wants to get our attention: she calls the men by name. With the innocent honesty of a little girl, she asks them what they are doing. She speaks directly to the father of one of her classmates, asking him to say “hey” to his little boy for her. In this way, the men of that mob become individuals again. Each one becomes himself again, aware of his responsibilities, and the mob silently disperses.
            Scout has become the little lamb who leads them, with innocent courage and a childlike desire for fairness—for what is right.  Like all children, Scout possesses no power. She certainly is no king or potentate or warrior—or, for that matter, wolf, leopard, bear, or lion.  Like Jesus, and like her father, Scout is on the side of the poor, the defenseless, the downtrodden.
            The poor man in today’s parable spends most of his time begging next to the gate of a rich man’s property. Like the courthouse doorway being guarded by Atticus Finch, the gate in this parable represents the barrier between two arenas: unjust power on one side and deserving poverty on the other. We are told several things about the rich man: that he dresses in purple and fine linen, that he feasts sumptuously every day, that he has five equally wealthy and corrupt brothers. But we are never told his name.  In this story, only the poor beggar covered in sores is given a name: Lazarus.  Consider! In the telling of this parable, Jesus refuses to dignify the rich man with a name, but he gives the name Lazarus, a name we know in another context as being the name of one of his best friends, to a beggar whose sores are licked by dogs. In the world we live in today (and, to be fair, in past generations), rich and powerful people are known and revered by name.  Even in Jesus’s time, people like the beggar Lazarus were considered members of a nameless throng, the countless, wretched, and powerless poor. I guess when we see them in that way, they are easier for us to ignore. But in this parable, Jesus clearly illustrates who is more important in God’s kingdom. When he dies, Lazarus is carried to heaven by angels and is comforted. The rich man, who never helped Lazarus while he had the opportunity, dies and goes straight to hell. 
          With the kind of audacity possessed by people who have always had things their way, the nameless rich man asks Father Abraham to send Lazarus to him with some water.  Abraham refuses, explaining that in the Kingdom things just don’t work that way. Then the rich man wants Abraham to send Lazarus to his father’s house to warn his family members about what is in store for them if they keep hording their wealth, arguing when Abraham objects that his brothers will surely believe a risen dead man—the beggar Lazarus, in this case. In telling this parable, Jesus clearly reminds us, as he reminds the deceased rich man, “If they do not listen to Moses and the prophets, neither will they be convinced, even if someone rises from the dead.”
            Could there be a double meaning for us in those last words of the parable?  Have we really been convinced by our risen Lord that serving Him is more important than serving our own self-interest? Or have we forsaken our Christian moral responsibility to seek and serve the Lord in ALL persons?  If we need a reminder of how our responsibility plays itself out in the real world, we need look no further than Paul’s letter to Timothy:  As for those who in the present age are rich, command them not to be haughty, or to set their hopes on the uncertainty of riches, but rather on God who richly provides us with everything for our enjoyment. They are to do good, to be rich in good works, generous, and ready to share, thus storing up for themselves the treasure of a good foundation for the future, so that they may take hold of the life that really is life.”
The collect for today states, “O God, you declare your almighty power chiefly in showing mercy and pity.”  Poor Lazarus found the mercy and pity he had always deserved when he arrived in heaven.  May we discover such abundant mercy on this side of the heavenly gate as we love all others just as Christ has loved us and take hold of the life that really is LIFE. 

AMEN.


No comments:

Post a Comment